|
Mikhail Minakov
|
UNIVERSAL NORMS IN A TIME OF SOVEREIGNTISM.
INTRODUCTION PDF
|
4
|
|
THEMATIC ARTICLES
|
|
Theoretical issues
|
|
Yurii Mielkov
|
FROM NATION STATE TO HUMAN PERSON:
THE EVOLUTION OF SOVEREIGNTY PDF
|
8
|
|
Emil Pain
|
UNIVERSALISM AND SOVEREIGHNTISM:
A PENDULUM MODEL * PDF
|
22
|
|
Ruslan Zaporozhchenko
|
SOVEREIGNTISM AS A VOCATION AND PROFESSION:
IMPERIAL ROOTS, CURRENT STATE, POSSIBLE PROSPECTS PDF
|
44
|
|
Oleksandr Fisun &
Nataliya Vinnykova
|
DE-ETATIZATION OF STATE SOVEREIGNTY
AND FORMATION OF GLOBAL “MAIDAN” PDF
|
72
|
|
Mikhail Minakov
|
THE SOVEREIGNTIST TURN: SOVEREIGNTY
AS A CONTESTED CONCEPT AGAIN PDF
|
87
|
|
Gulnara Shaikhutdinova
|
SOVEREIGNTISM AND NATIONALISM: CONSEQUENCES
FOR THE FRAGMENTATION OF INTERNATIONAL LAW PDF
|
115
|
|
Volodymyr Fadieiev
|
BEYOND THE NATIONAL: THE SOCIAL IMAGINARY
AND COSMOPOLITANISM ** PDF
|
131
|
|
Case Studies
|
|
Boyka Stefanova
|
SOVEREIGNTISM MEETS POST-WESTPHALIAN SOVEREIGNTY: THE EU EXPERIENCE PDF
|
168
|
|
Maria Snegovaya
|
GUNS TO BUTTER: SOCIOTROPIC CONCERNS
AND FOREIGN POLICY PREFERENCES IN RUSSIA * PDF
|
182
|
|
Andreas Umland
|
POST-SOVIET UKRAINIAN RADICAL SOVEREIGNTISM
IN COMPARATIVE PERSPECTIVE: ULTRANATIONALIST PARTIES AND ETHNOCENTRIC UNCIVIL SOCIETY * PDF
|
202
|
|
Oksana Dufeniuk
|
THE ECHR IMPACT ON THE FORMATION
OF SUPRANATIONAL AND NATIONAL HUMAN RIGHTS PARADIGM (UKRAINIAN CONTEXT) ** PDF
|
232
|
|
Sergey Shenin
|
NATO AND A CONFLICT BETWEEN SOVEREIGNTISM
AND UNIVERSALISM * PDF
|
251
|
|
Viktor Koziuk
|
IS A CENTRAL BANK’S INDEPENDENCE DOOMED
IN A TIME OF POPULISM? SOVEREIGNTISM
VS INSTITUTIONAL QUALITY ** PDF
|
275
|
|
DISCUSSIONS AND BOOK REVIEWS
|
|
Dmytro Khutkyy
|
HOW VAST OR HOW GOOD IS E-DEMOCRACY? A REVIEW ON THE “DIGITAL DEMOCRACY DATABASE” BY THE EUROPEAN DIGITAL DEVELOPMENT ALLIANCE PDF
|
302
|
|
Iryna Polets
|
BOOK REVIEW: Ostap Kushnir. (2020). Business, Values, and EU’s Response to Protests in Ukraine. Cases from 2003–04, 2010, and 2013–14. Warsaw: Lazarski University Press PDF
|
305
|
|
Yevhen Mahda
|
A TIMELY IDEA. BOOK REVIEW: Zmitser Lukashuk and Maxim Gariunou. (2020). Belaruskaia natsyanalnaia ideia: shto takoe Belarus I hto takiia belarusy: vosemdzesiat piats karotkih interviiu [from Bel.: The Belarusian national idea: what is Belarus and what do Belarusians want: eighty-five short interviews]. Minsk: Medysont ** PDF
|
309
|
|
Ihor Il’iushyn
|
BOOK REVIEW: Roman Ponomarenko (2018). Galyts’ki dobrovol’chi polki SS 1943–1944. Istoriia bez prykras. [from Ukr.: Galician SS Volunteer Regiments 1943–1944. History without Pretties].Ternopil’: Mandrivets’ * PDF
|
312
|
|
Dmitry Gorin
|
PARTING WAYS OF MODERNITY: LIFE-WORLDS, MODERNIZATION, AND DEMODERNIZATION. BOOK REVIEW: Mikhail Minakov. (2020). Dialektika sovremennosti v Vostochnoi Evrope. Opyt sotsialno-filosofskogo osmysleniia [from Rus.: Dialectics of the Eastern European modernity. A social-philosophical reflection]. Kiev: Laurus * PDF
|
317
|
|
Mikhail Lipkin
|
BOOK REVIEW: Serhiy Hirik (ed.). Ievreiy Ukraiiny: Revoliutsiia i pisliarevoliutsiina modernizatsiia. Polityka. Kultura. Suspilstvo [from Ukr.: The Jews of Ukraine: Revolution and post-revolutionary modernization. Politics, culture, society]. Київ: Laurus, 2018 * PDF
|
321
|